This Page Is a Work in Progress

This page is still being developed. If you have suggestions or want to contribute, please email info.spacerepo@gmail.com with the subject "Contribution for: Page".

Why the Thermal Environment Matters

Every satellite or probe must survive—and operate—inside a hostile thermal landscape that can swing hundreds of kelvins within minutes.
Understanding that landscape is the very first step in sizing radiators, heaters, insulation, and analysis margins.

---

Primary External Heat Sources

Symbol	Source	Typical Range*	Notes
q_solar	Direct solar flux	1 360 W·m⁻² at 1 AU	Scales by 1/r² with heliocentric distance
q_albedo	Planetary reflected sunlight	0 – 400 W·m⁻² (LEO)	Function of surface type & cloud cover
q_planetshine	Planetary IR emission	150 – 250 W·m⁻² (LEO)	Peaks in low‐altitude eclipse
q_atm	Free-molecular heating	Up to 2 W·m⁻² for <200 km	Only for very-low orbits & aerobraking
T_deep	Cosmic background	≈ 3 K	Sets ultimate heat sink for radiators

*Numbers are representative hot-case values in low-Earth orbit (LEO). See ECSS table 4‑7 for full envelope.[^1]

---

Orbital & Attitude Drivers

• Beta angle ($\beta$) – the Sun–orbit plane angle that controls eclipse duration.
• Altitude & eccentricity – set exposure time to planetary IR/albedo and to deep space.
• Spin & pointing laws – affect view factors and thermal gradients.
• Mission lifetime – drives sizing for coating degradation and MLI darkening trends.

NASA’s on-orbit environment charts (Fig. 7-1) are a handy visual summary.

NASA Fig. 7‑1 – Simplified heat-flow schematic (PDF, page 184)

---

Internal Heat Sources

Contribution	Design Cue
Payload & avionics dissipation ($Q_{gen}$)	Worst-case power mode + contingency margin
Battery charge/discharge	Peaks during eclipse and high-rate comm passes
Chemical reactions (e.g., thruster beds)	Transient “spikes” that often dominate hot-case
Crew metabolic load	Only for inhabited vehicles

Equation 1 expresses steady-state balance:

$$q_\text{solar} + q_\text{albedo} + q_\text{planetshine} + Q_\text{gen} = Q_\text{out,rad} + Q_\text{stored}$$

(from NASA SmallSat State-of-the-Art, 2021).

---

Thermal Cycling & Survival Limits

Orbit class	Typical (\Delta T) per orbit	Comment
Sun-sync LEO	50–80 K	30–35 min eclipse every orbit
GEO	~ 10 K daily	β ≈ 0° except around equinoxes
Lunar polar	260 K surface range	Long (≈ 14-day) eclipses
Deep-space cruise	Slow drift	Solar flux changes with (1/r^2)

Thermal analysis handbooks (Gilmore §2; ECSS-E-HB-31-03A) recommend adding 10–15 K analytical margin and 20–30 % uncertainty on optical properties when sizing heaters and radiators.[^2]

---

Standards & Reference Data

Standard / Guide	Scope
ECSS-E-HB-31-03A (2016)	Modelling, mesh independence, uncertainty budgets for European missions.[^3]
NASA Passive Thermal Control Engineering Guidebook (2023)	Material properties, small-sat heritage, design checklists.
ISO 21348 (2007)	Process for deriving reference solar irradiance spectra.[^4]
NASA TFAWS “On-Orbit Thermal Environments” course notes (2014)	Tutorial on beta angle, hot/cold cases.
Spacecraft Thermal Control Handbook – Vol. I (Gilmore)	Classical reference for temperature limits & hardware selection.

---

Useful Design Margins

• Analysis margin: ±10 °C on predicted temperatures.
• Optical property margin: +0.05 absorptivity / −0.05 emissivity (end-of-life).
• Power dissipation margin: +10 % (bus), +20 % (payload surges).
• MLI blanket edge loss: 5–10 % of total surface area treated as seam.

Values above follow ECSS Annex E plus NASA GSFC design heritage.[^5]

---

Example Figures & Diagrams

Tip: Right-click and Save link as… to download.

1. Generic node-to-space heat-flow diagram
   
2. Radiator steady-state balance schematic
   
3. Thermal environment overview from ECSS Figure 4-1 (PDF page 25)
   (https://ecss.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ECSS-E-HB-31-03A15November2016.pdf#page=25)
4. Orbiting spacecraft heating (NASA Fig. 7-1) (PDF page 184)
   (https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/7.soa_thermal_2021_0.pdf#page=184)

For additional high-resolution conceptual images, see the diagrams embedded in Application of the NewSpace and Microspace Philosophies to Small Satellites (hdl: 1807/108843).

---

Key Take-aways

• Spacecraft are heated primarily by direct solar, albedo, and planetary IR—and cooled only by radiation to 3 K space.
• Orbital geometry (β-angle, altitude, eclipse) dominates the thermal envelope; attitude rules the gradients.
• Early identification of hot & cold cases plus generous uncertainty budgets prevents late-stage heater or radiator growth.
• International standards (ECSS, ISO) and agency handbooks (NASA, JAXA, ESA) provide vetted data tables—use them before reinventing models.

---

References

1. NASA Small Spacecraft State-of-the-Art, Thermal Systems Chapter 7, 2021, pp. 183–204.
2. ECSS-E-HB-31-03A, Thermal Analysis Handbook, ESA, 2016.
3. ISO 21348:2007, Space Environment—Process for Determining Solar Irradiances.
4. Gilmore, D. G. (ed.), Spacecraft Thermal Control Handbook, 2nd ed., Aerospace Corp., 2002.
5. NASA TFAWS Course Notes, On-Orbit Thermal Environments, 2014.
6. NASA Passive Thermal Control Engineering Guidebook v4.0, 2023.
7. Hernández A. et al., “Calculation of Environmental Loads for a CubeSat using MATLAB,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2023.
8. Tachikawa S. et al., “Advanced Passive Thermal Control Materials and Devices for Spacecraft: A Review,” Int. J. Thermophysics, 2022.
9. University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies, Application of the NewSpace and Microspace Philosophies to Small Satellites, 2020, hdl: 1807/108843.

---